Comparison: Debica Presto UHP 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Budget

Debica

Presto UHP 2

VS

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2

R16 – R22

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Presto UHP 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

2

1

5

Best position

#4

#1

Average position

16.0

1.0

2.2

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

50

64

63

Wet

Debica Presto UHP 2

62%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

Debica Presto UHP 2

89%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Wet braking

Debica Presto UHP 2

44%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Debica Presto UHP 2

86%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Wet circle cornering

Debica Presto UHP 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Wet handling

Debica Presto UHP 2

45%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Comfort

Debica Presto UHP 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Debica Presto UHP 2

63%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Comfort

Debica Presto UHP 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry

Debica Presto UHP 2

71%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry braking

Debica Presto UHP 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dry handling

Debica Presto UHP 2

71%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Costs

Debica Presto UHP 2

50%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Debica Presto UHP 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Presto UHP 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison