Comparison: Debica Presto UHP 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Budget

Debica

Presto UHP 2

VS

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

9.5

R16 – R20

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Presto UHP 2

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

2

3

2

Best position

#4

#2

#1

Average position

16.0

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

50

34

23

Wet

Debica Presto UHP 2

62%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - cross

Debica Presto UHP 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Wet braking

Debica Presto UHP 2

44%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Debica Presto UHP 2

86%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet handling

Debica Presto UHP 2

45%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Comfort

Debica Presto UHP 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Debica Presto UHP 2

63%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Comfort

Debica Presto UHP 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Dry

Debica Presto UHP 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry handling

Debica Presto UHP 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Dry braking

Debica Presto UHP 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Costs

Debica Presto UHP 2

50%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Debica Presto UHP 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Presto UHP 2

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison