Comparison: Debica Presto UHP 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Budget

Debica

Presto UHP 2

VS

e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

9.8

R16 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Presto UHP 2

e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

Number of tests

2

3

26

Best position

#4

#2

#1

Average position

16.0

3.7

2.2

Latest test

2025

2026

Available sizes

50

34

66

Wet

Debica Presto UHP 2

62%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - cross

Debica Presto UHP 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Wet braking

Debica Presto UHP 2

44%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Debica Presto UHP 2

86%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Wet circle cornering

Debica Presto UHP 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Wet handling

Debica Presto UHP 2

45%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Comfort

Debica Presto UHP 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Exterior noise

Debica Presto UHP 2

63%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Comfort

Debica Presto UHP 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Dry

Debica Presto UHP 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry handling

Debica Presto UHP 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Dry braking

Debica Presto UHP 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Costs

Debica Presto UHP 2

50%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Mileage

Debica Presto UHP 2

50%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Debica Presto UHP 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Presto UHP 2

e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison