Segment
1. Debica Frigo 2 Lowcost2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo 2 vs. Nankang Winter Activa SV-3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Nankang). Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Nankang (9%). Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Frigo 2 and the Winter Activa SV-3 were tested.
| # | Debica Frigo 2
| Nankang Winter Activa SV-3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Debica Frigo 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,2 |
| Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 Rating: Poor | 4,7 | 2,5 | 5,5 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,7 |
| Show test details | |||||||
