18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Debica Frigo 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (94%) than Debica (50%). The first tyre test of Debica Frigo 2 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 75% of Debica Frigo 2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 83% of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has B rating.

Test Profile

Debica
Frigo 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Number of tests
1
23
Best position
#6
#1
Average position
6.0
3.3
Latest test
2018
2025
Available sizes
44
176

Snow

Snow
Debica Frigo 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Snow braking
Debica Frigo 2
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Snow handling
Debica Frigo 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Snow traction
Debica Frigo 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Costs

Costs
Debica Frigo 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Mileage
Debica Frigo 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%

Comfort

Comfort
Debica Frigo 2
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Exterior noise
Debica Frigo 2
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Interior noise
Debica Frigo 2
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Ice

Ice
Debica Frigo 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Ice braking
Debica Frigo 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison