Segment
1. CST Medallion MD-A1 Lowcost2. Nexen N Fera RU 1 Lowcost
Comparison: CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. Nexen N Fera RU 1
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (CST) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than CST (51%). But when it comes to comparing CST Medallion MD-A1 and Nexen N Fera RU 1, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/55 R17 test, where both the Medallion MD-A1 and the N Fera RU 1 were tested.
| # | CST Medallion MD-A1
| Nexen N Fera RU 1
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen N Fera RU 1 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen N Fera RU 1 Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| CST Medallion MD-A1 Rating: Not recommended | 3- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Nexen N Fera RU 1 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
