Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. CST Medallion MD-A1 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (CST) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than CST (58%). But when it comes to comparing CST Medallion MD-A1 and Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of CST Medallion MD-A1 was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/55 R17 test, where both the Medallion MD-A1 and the Ventus Prime3 K125 were tested.
| # | CST Medallion MD-A1
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. CST Medallion MD-A1 Lowcost
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| CST Medallion MD-A1 Rating: Not recommended | 3- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||