18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
WinterContact TS 860
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
23
4
2
5
3
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
#2
Average position
2.3
3.3
2.0
2.2
3.7
Latest test
2021
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
76
40
48
63
36

Dry

Dry
Continental WinterContact TS 860
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry driving behavior
Continental WinterContact TS 860
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
81%
Dry performance
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Wet

Wet
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental WinterContact TS 860
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Continental WinterContact TS 860
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet performance
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Snow

Snow
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
76%
Snow traction
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
81%
Snow braking
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
90%
Snow handling
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
67%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Comfort
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Costs

Costs
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Fuel efficiency
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Ice

Ice
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison