18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Continental
WinterContact TS 860
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
23
4
3
1
5
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
2.3
3.3
3.7
1.0
2.2
Latest test
2021
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
76
40
36
66
63

Dry

Dry
Continental WinterContact TS 860
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry driving behavior
Continental WinterContact TS 860
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry performance
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Wet

Wet
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet braking
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental WinterContact TS 860
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet circle cornering
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
Continental WinterContact TS 860
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet performance
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Snow

Snow
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Snow traction
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
Snow braking
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Snow handling
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Interior noise
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Comfort
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Costs

Costs
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Mileage
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Rolling resistance
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Fuel efficiency
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Price/value
Continental WinterContact TS 860
68%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Ice

Ice
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison