Segment
1. Continental UltraContact NXT Premium2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Bridgestone (84%). In this particular case, the Continental UltraContact NXT has a better rating of 95% compared to 77% of the Bridgestone Turanza 6. The first tyre test of Continental UltraContact NXT was done in 2025, compared to 2023 when was the Bridgestone Turanza 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Automotorsport 2025 215/55 R17 test, where both the UltraContact NXT and the Turanza 6 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Continental UltraContact NXT dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (77%) of the Bridgestone Turanza 6 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the UltraContact NXT is made in Portugal and Turanza 6 is made in Spain.
| # | Continental UltraContact NXT
| Bridgestone Turanza 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental UltraContact NXT Premium2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary2. Continental UltraContact NXT Test winner
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9.4 | 9.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | |||
| Continental UltraContact NXT Rating: Outstanding | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 8.8 | |||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Very good | 8.9 | 8.3 | 7.7 | 7.2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||