18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental SportContact 5 SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Kumho (59%). The first tyre test of Continental SportContact 5 SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 68% of Continental SportContact 5 SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (75%) of the Kumho Ecsta HS52 also have A wet ratings.

Test Profile

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
3
10
Best position
#1
#2
Average position
1.3
6.0
Latest test
2020
2026
Available sizes
93
104

Offroad

Offroad
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
86%

Wet

Wet
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Wet braking
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
98%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet circle cornering
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Wet handling
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Dry

Dry
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry handling
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Costs

Costs
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rolling resistance
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison