18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental SportContact 5 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
3
3
10
Best position
#1
#2
#2
Average position
1.3
3.3
6.0
Latest test
2020
2026
2026
Available sizes
93
40
104

Offroad

Offroad
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
86%

Wet

Wet
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Wet braking
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet circle cornering
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Wet handling
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Dry

Dry
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry handling
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
99%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Costs

Costs
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rolling resistance
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison