18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental SportContact 5 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
3
18
3
Best position
#1
#1
#2
Average position
1.3
6.1
3.7
Latest test
2020
2024
2025
Available sizes
93
47
34

Wet

Wet
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
98%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Offroad

Offroad
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
86%

Dry

Dry
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison