18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Continental SportContact 5 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Continental SportContact 5 SUVPremium
ContinentalContinental

SportContact 5 SUV

R18 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Firestone Roadhawk 2Upper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
3
3
6
Best position
#1
#2
#3
Average position
1.3
3.7
4.7
Latest test
2020
2025
2026
Available sizes
93
34
146

Offroad

Offroad
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
86%

Wet

Wet
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet braking
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
98%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
91%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet circle cornering
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Wet handling
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
100%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%

Dry

Dry
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
100%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry handling
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
99%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Dry braking
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
100%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%

Costs

Costs
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolling resistance
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
64%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Continental SportContact 5 SUV
64%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison