18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data


The Continental PremiumContact 7 and the Kumho Ecsta PS71 are both summer tyres that have demonstrated good performance in tests. However, the Continental PremiumContact 7 stands out as a top performer with an overall rating of 99% on our platform. Let's delve deeper into their features, performance, and comparisons.


The Continental PremiumContact 7, more about this tyre here, a successor to the well-respected Continental PremiumContact 6, and Continental ContiPremiumContact 5, is made in France, Slovakia, Germany, and Czechia. It's a summer tyre from Continental, perfect for touring, and known for its excellent handling and short braking distances. It especially stood out for its great handling performance in tests, resisting aquaplaning, and offering good rolling resistance.


On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta PS71, detailed information is available here, from Kumho, excels in comfort, wet braking and handling, effectively resisting aquaplaning. However, it's rated lower at 68% on our platform than the Continental tyre. This tyre doesn't have a successor as of now.


When these two tyres were put head-to-head in the Autobild test, the Continental PremiumContact 7 attained the 5th position out of 50 tyres. The Kumho Ecsta PS71, came in at 12th position and was lauded for its comfort, wet braking, handling, and resistance to aquaplaning.


In the ACE 2023 test, the Continental PremiumContact 7 bagged the 2nd position and got praised for its wet braking, wet handling, dry braking, and low rolling resistance. The Kumho Ecsta PS71 here lagged a bit behind, taking the 7th position mainly owing to its longitudinal aquaplaning.


In conclusion, the Continental PremiumContact 7 has an edge over the Kumho Ecsta PS71 in overall test performance, however, this does not imply that the Kumho tyre is inferior. The choice between the two will largely depend on specific requirements and performance aspects that a driver values the most.

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
26
15
3
Best position
#1
#2
#2
Average position
2.2
9.0
3.3
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
66
225
60

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta PS71
88%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Wet Braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Wet Handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
96%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet Circle Cornering
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Aquaplaning Cross
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Dry Performance
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Dry Braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry Handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Comfort & Noise
Continental PremiumContact 7
82%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta PS71
64%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Noise Exterior
Continental PremiumContact 7
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Economy
Continental PremiumContact 7
86%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta PS71
69%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook Ventus Evo
79%
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Rolling Resistance
Continental PremiumContact 7
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2025225/40 R18View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison