18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Hankook
ION Evo
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Number of tests
5
1
11
Best position
#7
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
1.0
11.6
Latest test
2022
2025
2024
Available sizes
676
64
121

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
80%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Price/value
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison