18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Hankook
ION Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
14
1
6
Best position
#1
#1
#3
Average position
3.8
1.0
4.7
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
Available sizes
35
64
146

Wet

Wet
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%

Dry

Dry
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry driving behavior
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Dry handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Dry braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%

Costs

Costs
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Mileage
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Rolling resistance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Interior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison