18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental AllSeasonContact vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

3 mutual test(s) with detailed data

In this text comparison, we will look into two well-known tyres in the market - the Continental AllSeasonContact and the Firestone Multiseason 2. The former is an all-round tyre known for its excellent performance on various terrains, while the latter is a winter tyre designed for optimal grip and stability in cold and icy conditions. Both tyres have been extensively tested and reviewed; let's dive into the strengths, weaknesses, and test results for each.


Starting with the Continental AllSeasonContact, it has an impressive rating of 90% on our website. Manufactured in Slovakia, Czech Republic, and France, it has no predecessor or successor models. According to tests conducted by Autoklub ČR, it secured 2nd position out of 10 tyres, excelling in aquaplaning, dry handling, comfort, and wet circle cornering. In Autobild tests, the tyre ranked 8th out of 32 and shone in snow braking, snow cornering, wet circle cornering, and comfort. Test summary from autobild 2020 praised its all-around performance, excellent winter qualities, and very good price-to-quality ratio.


On the other hand, the Firestone Multiseason 2 has a rating of 79% on our website. Manufactured in Italy, this tyre also has no predecessor or successor models. In Autoklub ČR tests, it secured the 6th position, while in Autobild tests, it ranked even higher at position 6 out of 32 tyres. The Firestone Multiseason 2 excels in price-to-value, snow traction, short wet and snow braking distances, with a high-mileage capacity and low rolling resistance, as per the autobild 2022 test summary.


However, both tyres have some weaknesses as well. The Continental AllSeasonContact was criticized for understeering and long braking distances on dry surfaces, limited mileage, and economy in the autobild 2022 test summary. Meanwhile, the Firestone Multiseason 2 had lower safety reserves for curve aquaplaning and extended dry braking distances.


In conclusion, both the Continental AllSeasonContact and Firestone Multiseason 2 have their strengths and weaknesses. Overall, the Continental AllSeasonContact seems to perform better in tests and offers great all-around performance, while the Firestone Multiseason 2 offers excellent price-to-quality ratio and better performance in some winter conditions. Therefore, the choice between these two largely depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the driver. Be sure to visit the manufacturer websites for Continental and Firestone to gain more insight and make an informed decision.

Test Profile

Continental
AllSeasonContact
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Number of tests
26
13
24
Best position
#1
#6
#1
Average position
4.2
10.9
2.7
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
100
61
151

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
Continental AllSeasonContact
77%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Firestone Multiseason 2
63%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Wet Braking
Continental AllSeasonContact
77%
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Wet Handling
Continental AllSeasonContact
59%
Firestone Multiseason 2
54%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Wet Circle Cornering
Continental AllSeasonContact
89%
Firestone Multiseason 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Aquaplaning Cross
Continental AllSeasonContact
80%
Firestone Multiseason 2
44%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Dry Performance
Continental AllSeasonContact
71%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Firestone Multiseason 2
70%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Dry Braking
Continental AllSeasonContact
63%
Firestone Multiseason 2
63%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
97%
Dry Handling
Continental AllSeasonContact
78%
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
86%
Snow Performance
Continental AllSeasonContact
90%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Michelin CrossClimate 2
91%
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Snow Braking
Continental AllSeasonContact
93%
Firestone Multiseason 2
86%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Snow Traction
Continental AllSeasonContact
84%
Firestone Multiseason 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
97%
Snow Handling
Continental AllSeasonContact
88%
Firestone Multiseason 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Snow Circle Cornering
Continental AllSeasonContact
95%
Firestone Multiseason 2
62%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
91%
Comfort & Noise
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Firestone Multiseason 2
72%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Noise Exterior
Continental AllSeasonContact
79%
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Ride Comfort
Continental AllSeasonContact
83%
Firestone Multiseason 2
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
80%
Economy
Continental AllSeasonContact
64%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Michelin CrossClimate 2
70%
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Rolling Resistance
Continental AllSeasonContact
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Mileage
Continental AllSeasonContact
56%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
56%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
Autoklub ČRAutoklub ČR
All season
2022205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
All season
2022195/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
All season
2021225/50 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison