Segment
1. Riken Suv Snow Lowcost
Comparison: Ceat WinterDrive SUV vs. Riken Suv Snow
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from . Generally, Ceat winter tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Riken (11%). Important for this comparison is also the Autozurnal 2025 215/65 R17 test, where both the WinterDrive SUV and the Suv Snow were tested.
| # | Ceat WinterDrive SUV
| Riken Suv Snow
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Riken Suv Snow Weak
Worst rating in test
2. Riken Suv Snow Weak
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 101.1 | 87.2 | 96.2 | 94.9 | |||
| Ceat WinterDrive SUV Rating: Good | 99.1 | 100.1 | 99.2 | 98.0 | |||
| Riken SUV Snow Rating: Weak | 96.0 | 94.5 | 96.4 | 97.0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
