18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Ceat WinterDrive SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Ceat
WinterDrive SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
1
18
3
5
4
5
Best position
#3
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.0
6.1
3.7
2.8
3.3
2.2
Latest test
2025
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
10
47
36
139
40
63

Wet

Wet
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet handling
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Snow

Snow
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
95%

Dry

Dry
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Comfort

Comfort
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Comfort
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Exterior noise
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Costs

Costs
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison