18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Ceat 4 SeasonDrive vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Dunlop All Season 2

The comparison below reviews two budget-friendly multi/season tyres tested by AutoBild and our lab: the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive (our rating: 63%) and the Firestone Multiseason 2 (our rating: 55%). Neither model has been replaced by a newer generation to date. Manufacturer pages: Ceat and Firestone.



Summary of test results


In the AutoBild comparative test (35 tyres), the two tyres ranked very differently: Firestone Multiseason 2 placed 9th, while the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive landed 34th of 35. Firestone scored particularly well for rolling resistance and braking on wet/snow in AutoBild, while Ceat was repeatedly noted for value, low noise and long mileage but flagged for limited winter performance and weakened wet braking.



Ceat 4 SeasonDrive — strengths & weaknesses


The Ceat 4 SeasonDrive stands out for price-conscious drivers: tests repeatedly highlight good mileage, a quiet ride and an attractive price point. Those characteristics likely explain its higher overall internal rating (63%) despite weaker test placements.

  • Strengths: long tread life; low rolling noise; very competitive price.

  • Weaknesses: limited winter capability with poor lateral guidance on snow and extended braking distances on wet surfaces. In AutoBild it finished near the bottom (34/35), driven down by the wet and snow handling deficits.


Verdict: Ceat is a sensible budget all-round tyre for drivers prioritising mileage, comfort and cost — but be aware of its compromised safety margins in wet and wintry conditions.



Firestone Multiseason 2 — strengths & weaknesses


Firestone’s Multiseason 2 scored better in comparative test position and was praised for its braking performance and efficiency: AutoBild highlights short snow and wet braking distances, high mileage and low rolling resistance. However, it is not without trade-offs.

  • Strengths: excellent rolling resistance (fuel-saving), strong wet and snow braking in test conditions, good mileage.

  • Weaknesses: only moderate lateral guidance on snow, limited safety reserves in curve aquaplaning and a somewhat longer dry braking distance.


Verdict: Overall, Firestone is the stronger performer in independent comparative tests — a superior choice if wet and snow braking and efficiency matter most, but expect modest compromises on dry handling precision.



Head-to-head conclusion


Which tyre is better in tests overall? Based on AutoBild positions and test notes, the Firestone Multiseason 2 outperforms the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive in core safety-relevant areas (wet and snow braking, rolling resistance) and placed much higher in the 35-tyre AutoBild field (9 vs 34). That said, our aggregated rating still gives Ceat a higher score (63% vs 55%) due to its strong points in noise, cost and mileage—factors that matter to many buyers.
Recommendation: choose Firestone Multiseason 2 if you prioritise test-proven braking performance and fuel efficiency; choose Ceat 4 SeasonDrive if you prioritise value, quietness and longevity but accept weaker wet/winter performance. For manufacturer details visit Ceat and Firestone.

Test Profile

Ceat
4 SeasonDrive
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Dunlop
All Season 2
Number of tests
4
13
5
Best position
#5
#6
#5
Average position
17.0
10.9
9.8
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
27
61
66

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
All season
2025225/40 R18View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison