18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Ceat 4 SeasonDrive vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Continental AllSeasonContact 2

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

The comparison below reviews two budget-friendly multi/season tyres tested by AutoBild and our lab: the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive (our rating: 63%) and the Firestone Multiseason 2 (our rating: 55%). Neither model has been replaced by a newer generation to date. Manufacturer pages: Ceat and Firestone.



Summary of test results


In the AutoBild comparative test (35 tyres), the two tyres ranked very differently: Firestone Multiseason 2 placed 9th, while the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive landed 34th of 35. Firestone scored particularly well for rolling resistance and braking on wet/snow in AutoBild, while Ceat was repeatedly noted for value, low noise and long mileage but flagged for limited winter performance and weakened wet braking.



Ceat 4 SeasonDrive — strengths & weaknesses


The Ceat 4 SeasonDrive stands out for price-conscious drivers: tests repeatedly highlight good mileage, a quiet ride and an attractive price point. Those characteristics likely explain its higher overall internal rating (63%) despite weaker test placements.

  • Strengths: long tread life; low rolling noise; very competitive price.

  • Weaknesses: limited winter capability with poor lateral guidance on snow and extended braking distances on wet surfaces. In AutoBild it finished near the bottom (34/35), driven down by the wet and snow handling deficits.


Verdict: Ceat is a sensible budget all-round tyre for drivers prioritising mileage, comfort and cost — but be aware of its compromised safety margins in wet and wintry conditions.



Firestone Multiseason 2 — strengths & weaknesses


Firestone’s Multiseason 2 scored better in comparative test position and was praised for its braking performance and efficiency: AutoBild highlights short snow and wet braking distances, high mileage and low rolling resistance. However, it is not without trade-offs.

  • Strengths: excellent rolling resistance (fuel-saving), strong wet and snow braking in test conditions, good mileage.

  • Weaknesses: only moderate lateral guidance on snow, limited safety reserves in curve aquaplaning and a somewhat longer dry braking distance.


Verdict: Overall, Firestone is the stronger performer in independent comparative tests — a superior choice if wet and snow braking and efficiency matter most, but expect modest compromises on dry handling precision.



Head-to-head conclusion


Which tyre is better in tests overall? Based on AutoBild positions and test notes, the Firestone Multiseason 2 outperforms the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive in core safety-relevant areas (wet and snow braking, rolling resistance) and placed much higher in the 35-tyre AutoBild field (9 vs 34). That said, our aggregated rating still gives Ceat a higher score (63% vs 55%) due to its strong points in noise, cost and mileage—factors that matter to many buyers.
Recommendation: choose Firestone Multiseason 2 if you prioritise test-proven braking performance and fuel efficiency; choose Ceat 4 SeasonDrive if you prioritise value, quietness and longevity but accept weaker wet/winter performance. For manufacturer details visit Ceat and Firestone.

Test Profile

Ceat
4 SeasonDrive
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Continental
AllSeasonContact 2
Number of tests
4
13
17
Best position
#5
#6
#1
Average position
17.0
10.9
2.5
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
27
61
284

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
77%
Continental
AllSeasonContact 2
Wet Braking
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
51%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
92%
Wet Handling
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
53%
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
84%
Wet Circle Cornering
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
73%
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
73%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
69%
Firestone Multiseason 2
46%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
69%
Aquaplaning Cross
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
67%
Firestone Multiseason 2
59%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
67%
Dry Performance
Firestone Multiseason 2
58%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
66%
Continental
AllSeasonContact 2
Dry Braking
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
67%
Firestone Multiseason 2
59%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
67%
Dry Handling
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
56%
Firestone Multiseason 2
56%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
64%
Snow Performance
Firestone Multiseason 2
72%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
86%
Continental
AllSeasonContact 2
Snow Braking
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
63%
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
79%
Snow Traction
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
59%
Firestone Multiseason 2
84%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
92%
Snow Handling
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
46%
Firestone Multiseason 2
69%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
77%
Snow Circle Cornering
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
46%
Firestone Multiseason 2
55%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
96%
Comfort & Noise
Firestone Multiseason 2
78%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
87%
Continental
AllSeasonContact 2
Noise Exterior
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
78%
Firestone Multiseason 2
78%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
87%
Economy
Firestone Multiseason 2
67%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
84%
Continental
AllSeasonContact 2
Rolling Resistance
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
59%
Firestone Multiseason 2
92%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
75%
Mileage
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
75%
Firestone Multiseason 2
42%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
92%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
All season
2023225/45 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison