18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) (2026)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Kumho (70%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo has a better rating of 93% compared to 87% of the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo was done in 2026, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Auto Bild 2026 255/45 R19 test, where both the Potenza Sport Evo and the Ecsta Sport (PS72) were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) also have A wet ratings.

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Potenza Sport Evo
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Number of tests
7
6
Best position
#1
#1
Average position
4.6
4.7
Latest test
2026
2026
Available sizes
105
105

These tyres were not tested together. The comparison below is inferred from separate tests by normalizing both tyres against 24 shared benchmark tyres, so treat it as an estimate.

Dry
Confidence
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
95%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
99%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
96%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
93%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
90%
Dry lane changing
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
98%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
98%
Wet
Confidence
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
94%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
94%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
93%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
94%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
95%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
99%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
98%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
96%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
96%
Comfort
Confidence
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
88%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
90%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
88%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
90%
Costs
Confidence
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
88%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
97%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
97%
Mileage
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
95%
Price Mileage Ratio
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
79%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
99%
Other
Confidence
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
99%
Gesamtnote
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
99%
Offroad
Confidence
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
94%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
98%
Handling on gravel
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
100%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
100%
Grass traction
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
94%
Gravel traction
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
90%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
97%
Sand traction
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
88%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
Auto BildAuto Bild
Summer
2026255/45 R19View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2026245/45 R19View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2026245/45 R19View
ACEACE
Summer
2026225/40 R18View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.