Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo Premium2. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Falken (70%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo has a better rating of 83% compared to 74% of the Falken Azenis FK520. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo was done in 2026, compared to 2023 when was the Falken Azenis FK520 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2026 245/45 R19 test, where both the Potenza Sport Evo and the Azenis FK520 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
| Falken Azenis FK520
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo Premium2. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo Highly recommended2. Falken Azenis FK520 Highly recommended
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Good -
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport EVO | 34.5 | 28.2 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 | 35.3 | 27.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 141 | 68 | 55 | 23 | 16 | 7 | |
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo Rating: Highly recommended | 138 | 66 | 55 | 17 | 13 | 4 | |
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Highly recommended | 135 | 62 | 52 | 21 | 15 | 6 | |
| Show test details | |||||||