18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone M788 vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S (2026)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Kumho (71%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 75% of Bridgestone M788 has C wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Kumho HA32 Solus 4S has B rating.

Test Profile

Bridgestone
M788
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Number of tests
9
Best position
#5
Average position
10.8
Latest test
2023
Available sizes
11
73

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
Wet braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
61%
Wet handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
62%
Comfort
Confidence
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
76%
Exterior noise
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
81%
Comfort
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
Costs
Confidence
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
65%
Price/value
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
83%
Mileage
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
70%
Rolling resistance
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
59%
Dry
Confidence
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Dry handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
74%
Dry braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.