Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Vredestein (59%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak W810 and Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the Blizzak W810 and the Comtrac 2 Winter were tested.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak W810
| Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Premium
1. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Still recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended
1. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Conditionally recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2,6 | 2,9 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
| Show test details | |||||||