Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Pirelli (71%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak W810 and Pirelli CARRIER WINTER, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the Blizzak W810 and the CARRIER WINTER were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 75% of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (63%) of the Pirelli CARRIER WINTER also have C wet ratings.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak W810
| Pirelli CARRIER WINTER
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Premium
1. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended
1. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Rating: Recommended | 3,3 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 2,7 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 1,9 |
| Show test details | |||||||