18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
5
18
Best position
#7
#1
#1
Average position
7.0
4.4
6.1
Latest test
2019
2026
2024
Available sizes
56
99
47

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
51%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
61%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
34%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
40%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%

Snow

Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
58%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
44%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Ice

Ice
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
74%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
73%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison