Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

R14 – R17

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Turanza T005

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test Profile

Blizzak W810

EuroWinter VAN01

ION FlexClimate

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

1

10

Best position

#7

#6

#1

#2

Average position

7.0

6.0

1.0

6.0

Latest test

2019

2025

2026

Available sizes

56

33

27

109

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

51%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

66%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Wet braking

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

40%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Wet circle cornering

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

61%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Wet handling

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

34%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

57%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Snow

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

48%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Dry

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

82%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Dry braking

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Comfort

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

58%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

80%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Exterior noise

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

44%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

91%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Costs

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

73%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Mileage

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Ice

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best ice tyres Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs Continental VanContact Winter

Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01

Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs Uniroyal SNOW MAX 2

Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs Kumho PorTran CW51

Browse by brand

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Blizzak W810

EuroWinter VAN01

ION FlexClimate

Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison