Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Continental SportContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

Continental

Also compare with

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Blizzak W810

SportContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

16

4

3

Best position

#7

#1

#2

Average position

7.0

1.2

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2019

2026

2025

Available sizes

56

124

40

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

51%

Continental SportContact 7

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Continental SportContact 7

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

40%

Continental SportContact 7

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

61%

Continental SportContact 7

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

34%

Continental SportContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Continental SportContact 7

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Snow

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Dry

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Continental SportContact 7

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Continental SportContact 7

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Comfort

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

58%

Continental SportContact 7

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

44%

Continental SportContact 7

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Ice

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Costs

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

73%

Continental SportContact 7

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best ice tyres Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs Continental VanContact Winter

Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

Continental SportContact 7 vs Hankook Ventus Evo

Continental SportContact 7 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Continental SportContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Continental SportContact 7 vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Browse by brand

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Continental SportContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Blizzak W810

SportContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison