18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-80 Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
3
18
4
3
5
5
Best position
#6
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
6.7
6.1
3.3
3.7
2.8
2.2
Latest test
2018
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
50
47
40
36
139
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
92%
Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store