18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
14
10
16
3
1
Best position
#1
#2
#3
#2
#1
Average position
3.6
6.0
5.5
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2025
2026
2023
2025
2025
Available sizes
194
109
153
36
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Snow traction
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Snow braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Snow handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry lane changing
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Offroad
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Ice
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%

Tread pattern comparison

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store