18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
BFGoodrich AdvantageUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
14
10
14
4
3
Best position
#1
#2
#8
#2
#2
Average position
3.6
6.0
13.4
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2025
2026
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
194
109
153
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet performance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Wet side guide
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Snow traction
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Snow braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Snow handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry performance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dry steering response
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Offroad
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Ice
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%

Tread pattern comparison

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyresBest tyres for EVsBest ice tyresBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian WetproofBFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNBFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone RoadhawkBFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Browse by brand

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenDunlopGT

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store