18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Number of tests
14
18
4
4
3
29
Best position
#1
#1
#3
#2
#2
#1
Average position
3.6
6.1
12.0
3.3
3.7
3.7
Latest test
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
194
47
111
40
36
180

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Wet performance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Wet side guide
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Snow
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Snow traction
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Snow braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Snow handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
Snow cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Lateral guidance on snow
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
98%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Dry
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Dry lane changing
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Dry performance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Dry steering response
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Costs
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Price/value
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
Comfort
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Offroad
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Ice
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
23%

Tread pattern comparison

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store