18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
14
13
4
29
4
Best position
#1
#7
#2
#1
#2
Average position
3.6
11.9
3.3
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
194
82
40
180
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Wet performance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Wet side guide
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
52%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Snow traction
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Snow braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Snow handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
27%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
Snow cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Snow performance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
85%
Lateral guidance on snow
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
98%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Dry performance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Dry lane changing
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Dry steering response
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Dry driving behavior
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Price/value
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Offroad
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Ice
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
23%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store