18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
14
17
18
3
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#2
Average position
3.6
1.7
6.1
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2024
2025
Available sizes
194
80
47
36

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Snow

Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow traction
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Snow braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Snow cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Lateral guidance on snow
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
98%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
100%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%

Offroad

Offroad
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Ice

Ice
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison