18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
14
28
4
10
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
3.6
2.3
3.3
6.0
Latest test
2025
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
194
67
40
109

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Wet performance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%

Snow

Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Snow traction
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Snow braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Snow handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Dry lane changing
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry performance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Dry steering response
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Price/value
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Offroad

Offroad
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Ice

Ice
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison