Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Premium2. Barum Polaris 6 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Barum (73%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 has a better rating of 91% compared to 83% of the Barum Polaris 6. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was done in 2024, compared to 2025 when was the Barum Polaris 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Blizzak 6 and the Polaris 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak 6 has B wet grip rating, whereas 87% of Barum Polaris 6 has C rating. We also know where Blizzak 6 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak 6
| Barum Polaris 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Premium2. Barum Polaris 6 Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Exemplary2. Barum Polaris 6 Good
1. Barum Polaris 6 Good
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | 1 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | |||
| Barum Polaris 6 Rating: Good | 3 | 2– | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.1 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 | 35.0 | 28.0 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 6 | 35.1 | 28.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||