18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Mud Terrain T/A KM2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 (2026)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than BFGoodrich (70%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich Mud Terrain T/A KM2 was done in 2016, compared to 2022 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 first tested.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Mud Terrain T/A KM2
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Number of tests
1
15
Best position
#2
#2
Average position
2.0
6.1
Latest test
2016
2026
Available sizes
10
176

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
79%
Wet braking
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Wet handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
70%
Wet circle cornering
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
86%
Comfort
Confidence
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Exterior noise
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Comfort
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Offroad
Confidence
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Dry
Confidence
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
Dry braking
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
86%
Dry handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
Costs
Confidence
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Rolling resistance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Mileage
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.