18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Number of tests
23
15
49
Best position
#1
#6
#1
Average position
6.7
15.5
3.2
Latest test
2025
2025
2024
Available sizes
107
28
213

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
62%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Wet Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Sava Eskimo HP2
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
97%
Wet Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Sava Eskimo HP2
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Wet Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Sava Eskimo HP2
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Sava Eskimo HP2
57%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Aquaplaning Cross
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
Sava Eskimo HP2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Dry Performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
68%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Dry Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
75%
Dry Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Snow Performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
79%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Snow Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
94%
Sava Eskimo HP2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Snow Traction
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
Sava Eskimo HP2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Snow Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
92%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Snow Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Comfort & Noise
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
76%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Noise Exterior
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%
Sava Eskimo HP2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
88%
Ride Comfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
75%
Economy
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
79%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
75%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Rolling Resistance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Mileage
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
67%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2021205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2019225/45 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison