18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
23
3
4
3
Best position
#1
#4
#2
#2
Average position
6.7
4.3
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
107
99
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Dry
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Wet
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Snow
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Snow traction
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Snow braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Snow handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Snow cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Comfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Costs
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Ice
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store