18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
23
4
3
28
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
6.7
3.3
3.7
2.3
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
107
40
36
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Dry
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry steering response
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Wet
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Snow
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Snow traction
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Snow braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Snow handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Snow cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Comfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Costs
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Price/value
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Ice
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store