18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

3 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Number of tests
23
17
49
Best position
#1
#1
#1
Average position
6.7
1.7
3.2
Latest test
2025
2025
2024
Available sizes
107
80
213

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Wet Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Wet Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Wet Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
88%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Aquaplaning Cross
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Dry Performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Dry Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
75%
Dry Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Dry Lane Change
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Dry Steering Reaction
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Snow Performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Snow Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Snow Traction
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
88%
Snow Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Snow Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Ice Performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
71%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Ice Braking Abs
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
71%
Comfort & Noise
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870
81%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Noise Exterior
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Ride Comfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Economy
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
62%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
66%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Rolling Resistance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
53%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Mileage
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
55%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Winter
2022185/65 R15View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2021205/55 R16View
AutoMotorSportAutoMotorSport
Winter
2021195/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison