18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Upper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

8.1
R14 – R20
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

8.2
R14 – R22
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7
R13 – R21
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 WinterContact TS 870 UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Number of tests
23
49
3
Best position
#1
#1
#4
Average position
6.7
3.2
4.3
Latest test
2025
2024
2025
Available sizes
107
213
97

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Dry steering response
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%

Snow

Snow
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Snow traction
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Snow braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Snow handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Snow cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Snow performance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%
Lateral guidance on snow
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Comfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Mileage
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Price/value
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%

Ice

Ice
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Ice braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Ice lateral guidance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison