18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

If you are stuck choosing between the BFGoodrich Advantage tyre and the Nokian WetProof tyre, we are here to help you make an informed decision by comparing their overall test results and strengths/weaknesses. The BFGoodrich Advantage has an 80% overall rating, while the Nokian WetProof has a slightly better score with 87%.


First, let’s examine the BFGoodrich Advantage tyre. According to test results, this tyre performed better in fuel efficiency in the ADAC test, with a 9th position out of 15. It also showcased strong dry handling and dry handling in the Autobild test, ranking 18th out of 53 tyres tested. However, the BFGoodrich Advantage our rating did not rank as high in other tests, such as Autozeitung, GTÜ, and Firmenauto.


On the other hand, the Finnish-made Nokian WetProof tyre demonstrated a better overall performance in the tests. It ranked higher in noise and wet circle cornering in the ADAC test, with a 11th position out of 15 tyres. The WetProof also showed exceptionally good results in GTÜ and Firmenauto tests, placing 2nd in both with top features like wet circle cornering, wet handling, wet handling (objective), wet side guide, and exterior noise. It even ranked 6th in Autozeitung and AutoBild tests.


A summary of Nokian WetProof's strengths (autumn 2017) include its effectiveness, balanced performance, and good wet and dry traction. The tyre's weaknesses lie in its environmental balance, wear life, abrasion, and sustainability.


In conclusion, our verdict for both tyre's overall strengths and weaknesses are as follows:


  • BFGoodrich Advantage

  • Strengths: Fuel Efficiency, Dry Handling

  • Weaknesses: Overall medioćre test results compared to Nokian WetProof



  • Nokian WetProof

  • Strengths: Noise, Wet Circle Cornering, Wet Handling, Exterior Noise

  • Weaknesses: Environmental Balance, Wear Life, Abrasion, Sustainability


When choosing between the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Nokian WetProof tyres, the WetProof appears to be better overall, ranking higher in most categories with slightly better ratings. However, it is crucial to consider specific tests relevant to your driving needs when making a decision.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nokian
WetProof
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
14
14
3
Best position
#8
#1
#2
Average position
13.4
5.6
3.3
Latest test
2026
2023
2026
Available sizes
153
47
60

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nokian WetProof
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Nokian WetProof
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Nokian WetProof
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Nokian WetProof
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Nokian WetProof
89%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Nokian WetProof
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Nokian WetProof
81%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Nokian WetProof
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Nokian WetProof
53%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Nokian WetProof
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Nokian WetProof
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Nokian WetProof
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Nokian WetProof
46%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison