18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

3 mutual test(s) with detailed data

If you are stuck choosing between the BFGoodrich Advantage tyre and the Nokian WetProof tyre, we are here to help you make an informed decision by comparing their overall test results and strengths/weaknesses. The BFGoodrich Advantage has an 80% overall rating, while the Nokian WetProof has a slightly better score with 87%.


First, let’s examine the BFGoodrich Advantage tyre. According to test results, this tyre performed better in fuel efficiency in the ADAC test, with a 9th position out of 15. It also showcased strong dry handling and dry handling in the Autobild test, ranking 18th out of 53 tyres tested. However, the BFGoodrich Advantage our rating did not rank as high in other tests, such as Autozeitung, GTÜ, and Firmenauto.


On the other hand, the Finnish-made Nokian WetProof tyre demonstrated a better overall performance in the tests. It ranked higher in noise and wet circle cornering in the ADAC test, with a 11th position out of 15 tyres. The WetProof also showed exceptionally good results in GTÜ and Firmenauto tests, placing 2nd in both with top features like wet circle cornering, wet handling, wet handling (objective), wet side guide, and exterior noise. It even ranked 6th in Autozeitung and AutoBild tests.


A summary of Nokian WetProof's strengths (autumn 2017) include its effectiveness, balanced performance, and good wet and dry traction. The tyre's weaknesses lie in its environmental balance, wear life, abrasion, and sustainability.


In conclusion, our verdict for both tyre's overall strengths and weaknesses are as follows:


  • BFGoodrich Advantage

  • Strengths: Fuel Efficiency, Dry Handling

  • Weaknesses: Overall medioćre test results compared to Nokian WetProof



  • Nokian WetProof

  • Strengths: Noise, Wet Circle Cornering, Wet Handling, Exterior Noise

  • Weaknesses: Environmental Balance, Wear Life, Abrasion, Sustainability


When choosing between the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Nokian WetProof tyres, the WetProof appears to be better overall, ranking higher in most categories with slightly better ratings. However, it is crucial to consider specific tests relevant to your driving needs when making a decision.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nokian
WetProof
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Number of tests
14
14
33
Best position
#8
#1
#1
Average position
13.4
5.6
4.1
Latest test
2026
2023
2025
Available sizes
153
47
658

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nokian WetProof
78%
Nokian
WetProof
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Wet Braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Nokian WetProof
69%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Wet Handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
52%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
80%
Wet Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
78%
Nokian WetProof
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nokian WetProof
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
64%
Aquaplaning Cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Nokian WetProof
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
Dry Performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nokian WetProof
68%
Nokian
WetProof
Bridgestone Turanza T005
88%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Dry Braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Dry Handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
82%
Nokian WetProof
74%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
88%
Dry Lane Change
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Nokian WetProof
62%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
100%
Dry Steering Reaction
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Nokian WetProof
58%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
92%
Comfort & Noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
71%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nokian WetProof
73%
Nokian
WetProof
Bridgestone Turanza T005
64%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Noise Exterior
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
54%
Noise Interior
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Ride Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Nokian WetProof
53%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
57%
Economy
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nokian WetProof
63%
Nokian
WetProof
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Rolling Resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
67%
Nokian WetProof
67%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
98%
Fuel Efficiency
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
89%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Nokian WetProof
45%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
61%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
FirmenautoFirmenauto
Summer
2021195/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2021205/55 R16View
ADACADAC
Summer
2021205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison