18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Nokian WetProof

If you are stuck choosing between the BFGoodrich Advantage tyre and the Nokian WetProof tyre, we are here to help you make an informed decision by comparing their overall test results and strengths/weaknesses. The BFGoodrich Advantage has an 80% overall rating, while the Nokian WetProof has a slightly better score with 87%.


First, let’s examine the BFGoodrich Advantage tyre. According to test results, this tyre performed better in fuel efficiency in the ADAC test, with a 9th position out of 15. It also showcased strong dry handling and dry handling in the Autobild test, ranking 18th out of 53 tyres tested. However, the BFGoodrich Advantage our rating did not rank as high in other tests, such as Autozeitung, GTÜ, and Firmenauto.


On the other hand, the Finnish-made Nokian WetProof tyre demonstrated a better overall performance in the tests. It ranked higher in noise and wet circle cornering in the ADAC test, with a 11th position out of 15 tyres. The WetProof also showed exceptionally good results in GTÜ and Firmenauto tests, placing 2nd in both with top features like wet circle cornering, wet handling, wet handling (objective), wet side guide, and exterior noise. It even ranked 6th in Autozeitung and AutoBild tests.


A summary of Nokian WetProof's strengths (autumn 2017) include its effectiveness, balanced performance, and good wet and dry traction. The tyre's weaknesses lie in its environmental balance, wear life, abrasion, and sustainability.


In conclusion, our verdict for both tyre's overall strengths and weaknesses are as follows:


  • BFGoodrich Advantage

  • Strengths: Fuel Efficiency, Dry Handling

  • Weaknesses: Overall medioćre test results compared to Nokian WetProof



  • Nokian WetProof

  • Strengths: Noise, Wet Circle Cornering, Wet Handling, Exterior Noise

  • Weaknesses: Environmental Balance, Wear Life, Abrasion, Sustainability


When choosing between the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Nokian WetProof tyres, the WetProof appears to be better overall, ranking higher in most categories with slightly better ratings. However, it is crucial to consider specific tests relevant to your driving needs when making a decision.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nokian
WetProof
Number of tests
14
14
Best position
#8
#1
Average position
13.4
5.6
Latest test
2026
2023
Available sizes
153
47

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nokian WetProof
84%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Nokian WetProof
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Nokian WetProof
77%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
55%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
46%
Nokian WetProof
69%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Nokian WetProof
95%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Nokian WetProof
90%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Nokian WetProof
80%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Nokian WetProof
72%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Nokian WetProof
79%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
60%
Nokian WetProof
79%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Nokian WetProof
53%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Nokian WetProof
60%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Nokian WetProof
67%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Nokian WetProof
53%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View
AutozeitungAutozeitung
Summer
2022215/55 R17View
GTÜGTÜ
Summer
2021225/45 R17View
FirmenautoFirmenauto
Summer
2021195/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2021205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2021205/55 R16View
ADACADAC
Summer
2021205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison