18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Looking at summer tyres, we have a comparison between two popular options: the BFGoodrich Advantage and Kleber Dynaxer HP4. These are products from reputable manufacturers BFGoodrich and Kleber, respectively. Let's delve into their strengths, weaknesses and how they performed in various tests.


Update: These models are not replaced by any newer releases so far. Refer to the following links for the latest versions of BFGoodrich Advantage and Kleber Dynaxer HP4.


The BFGoodrich Advantage received an overall rating of 76%, standing out for its rousing dry handling and quiet ride. On the other hand, it showed a tendency towards understeer in the wet. Test results from AutoBild show it placed 18th out of 53 tyres, with dry handling and comfort being its strongest features. Test summaries in AutoBild 2024 and AutoBild 2022 highlight the robust driving behavior and short braking distances on dry roads. However, the handling tends to understeer and braking distances extend in wet conditions.


On the other hand, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 exceeded in the overall rating with 82%, impressing with its comfort and external noise reduction. Yet, it showed some imbalances and weaknesses on wet roads. In the AutoBild test, it secured the 14th place out of 53 tyres. Its prowess in comfort and exterior noise were highlighted. In AutoBild 2024 and AutoBild 2022, the tyre earned appreciation for good aquaplaning characteristics, short wet and dry braking distances, good driving comfort, and quiet rolling noise. However, it's grip on wet surfaces and deferring steering response remained areas of concern.


In ADAC 's testing, BFGoodrich Advantage held 21st place from 50, whereas, Kleber Dynaxer HP4 stood higher in the 12th position.


In conclusion, while both tyres showcase positive aspects in terms of comfort and handling, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 edges out the BFGoodrich Advantage in overall performance across multiple tests, despite its few shortcomings. However, the BFGoodrich Advantage provides commendable performance with a particular thrust on dry handling, positioned as an affordable and reliable option.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
14
11
3
3
Best position
#8
#1
#2
#2
Average position
13.4
11.6
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
2025
Available sizes
153
121
40
34

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Wet performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison