18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Looking at summer tyres, we have a comparison between two popular options: the BFGoodrich Advantage and Kleber Dynaxer HP4. These are products from reputable manufacturers BFGoodrich and Kleber, respectively. Let's delve into their strengths, weaknesses and how they performed in various tests.


Update: These models are not replaced by any newer releases so far. Refer to the following links for the latest versions of BFGoodrich Advantage and Kleber Dynaxer HP4.


The BFGoodrich Advantage received an overall rating of 76%, standing out for its rousing dry handling and quiet ride. On the other hand, it showed a tendency towards understeer in the wet. Test results from AutoBild show it placed 18th out of 53 tyres, with dry handling and comfort being its strongest features. Test summaries in AutoBild 2024 and AutoBild 2022 highlight the robust driving behavior and short braking distances on dry roads. However, the handling tends to understeer and braking distances extend in wet conditions.


On the other hand, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 exceeded in the overall rating with 82%, impressing with its comfort and external noise reduction. Yet, it showed some imbalances and weaknesses on wet roads. In the AutoBild test, it secured the 14th place out of 53 tyres. Its prowess in comfort and exterior noise were highlighted. In AutoBild 2024 and AutoBild 2022, the tyre earned appreciation for good aquaplaning characteristics, short wet and dry braking distances, good driving comfort, and quiet rolling noise. However, it's grip on wet surfaces and deferring steering response remained areas of concern.


In ADAC 's testing, BFGoodrich Advantage held 21st place from 50, whereas, Kleber Dynaxer HP4 stood higher in the 12th position.


In conclusion, while both tyres showcase positive aspects in terms of comfort and handling, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 edges out the BFGoodrich Advantage in overall performance across multiple tests, despite its few shortcomings. However, the BFGoodrich Advantage provides commendable performance with a particular thrust on dry handling, positioned as an affordable and reliable option.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
14
11
21
3
Best position
#8
#1
#2
#2
Average position
13.4
11.6
11.9
3.3
Latest test
2026
2024
2024
2026
Available sizes
153
121
164
40

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Fuel efficiency
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison