18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4

3 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Looking at summer tyres, we have a comparison between two popular options: the BFGoodrich Advantage and Kleber Dynaxer HP4. These are products from reputable manufacturers BFGoodrich and Kleber, respectively. Let's delve into their strengths, weaknesses and how they performed in various tests.


Update: These models are not replaced by any newer releases so far. Refer to the following links for the latest versions of BFGoodrich Advantage and Kleber Dynaxer HP4.


The BFGoodrich Advantage received an overall rating of 76%, standing out for its rousing dry handling and quiet ride. On the other hand, it showed a tendency towards understeer in the wet. Test results from AutoBild show it placed 18th out of 53 tyres, with dry handling and comfort being its strongest features. Test summaries in AutoBild 2024 and AutoBild 2022 highlight the robust driving behavior and short braking distances on dry roads. However, the handling tends to understeer and braking distances extend in wet conditions.


On the other hand, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 exceeded in the overall rating with 82%, impressing with its comfort and external noise reduction. Yet, it showed some imbalances and weaknesses on wet roads. In the AutoBild test, it secured the 14th place out of 53 tyres. Its prowess in comfort and exterior noise were highlighted. In AutoBild 2024 and AutoBild 2022, the tyre earned appreciation for good aquaplaning characteristics, short wet and dry braking distances, good driving comfort, and quiet rolling noise. However, it's grip on wet surfaces and deferring steering response remained areas of concern.


In ADAC 's testing, BFGoodrich Advantage held 21st place from 50, whereas, Kleber Dynaxer HP4 stood higher in the 12th position.


In conclusion, while both tyres showcase positive aspects in terms of comfort and handling, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 edges out the BFGoodrich Advantage in overall performance across multiple tests, despite its few shortcomings. However, the BFGoodrich Advantage provides commendable performance with a particular thrust on dry handling, positioned as an affordable and reliable option.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Number of tests
14
11
Best position
#8
#1
Average position
13.4
11.6
Latest test
2026
2024
Available sizes
153
121

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
62%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Wet Braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Wet Handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
55%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
55%
Wet Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
65%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
73%
Aquaplaning Cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
68%
Dry Performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Dry Braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
72%
Dry Handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
60%
Comfort & Noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
78%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
85%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Noise Exterior
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
89%
Ride Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
80%
Economy
BFGoodrich Advantage
67%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
65%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Rolling Resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
74%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
71%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
60%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
58%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2021205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison